built project w/ Mario Ramoni Building,
Photography,
Innsbruck,
Austria
Design competition to Development for the new centralized printing hub for Land Tirol. All images by Maya Christodoulaki.
built project w/ Mario RamoniBuilding, Paznauntal, AustriaNestled on the steep hillside to the south of the church of St. Anthonius stands the new cemetery of Kappl. The work is conceived as a natural platform for contemplation, carefully designed to offer an unparalleled panorama of the Paznaun valley in Tirol that unfolds towards the southwest.
Defined by a formidable concrete wall to the south, the site traverses three distinct levels, seamlessly connected by two gently winding ramps. Upon arrival at the initial terrace from the adjacent municipal road, visitors are greeted by a single-storey concrete structure with an encased oak urn wall. Midway through the site, the visitor pauses where the two ramps change direction. Here, a sheltered outdoor sitting niche beckons with a strategically placed window and a serene water feature, crafting a moment of tranquillity that counters the upper building's presence. The journey through the cemetery's terraces finds completion as the visitor ascends back to the first level via a small staircase, guiding them to the entrance. This gentle circulation contributes to the solemn ambiance of the grounds, inviting contemplation within the serene embrace of nature and architecture. All images courtesy of Martin Tusch.
Teaching, AI, ATTP,TU Vienna, Architecture Theory The Rome/Fortune seminar aims to connect
the idea of asarotos oikos (the unswept house, das ungefegte Haus)—a
visual motif depicting a mosaic floor scattered with the remnants of a lavish
banquet—to the concepts of the given and the existing (Bestand).
By inhabiting the unswept floor of Hadrian’s Villa
in Rome, we establish a way of thinking that learns through accumulation,
leftovers, and what resists cleaning up. At once intimate and excessive, the
image frames domestic comfort as abundance, disorder, and residue.
Among bones, shells, peels, and nuts, this figure
complements the idea of learning as home, introduced by Vitruvius in his
reflections on domestic architecture. For Vitruvius, the fulcrum of
architecture lies in the abundance of learning: a capacity that transcends
geography, social ties, and the instability of fortune (fortuna),
granting the learned individual a form of global citizenship.
Tasked with the extreme allowances produced by the
amplitude of computational and built Bestand, the seminar turns toward
the curious nature of foundations. We look at the floor and resist the desire
to clean the unswept. Rather, we negotiate its principality; rather, we think
in terms of affordances. How might we observe and speculate, bridge noise with
measure, see perspective through the oblique, compute the primary through the
provisional?
Drawing on Michel Serres’ Foundations trilogy—Rome,Statues, Geometry—the course moves between human and machine,
tracing relations within what is already present. Through the writings of
Vitruvius, Michel Serres, Massimo Scollari, Erwin Panofsky, Pierre Hadot,
Manfredo Tafuri, Ernst Cassirer, and Raymond Ruyer, the seminar sways between
Rome and Fortune to think the spatial through the soft.
Everybody talks about Chance: An architectonic arrival with Arakawa+Gins2025
‘If
the poet … must perforce dramatize the oneness of the experience, even though
paying tribute to its diversity, then his use of paradox and ambiguity is seen
as necessary.’ – Cleanth Brooks in Venturi’s Complexity and Contradiction
‘An
eternal object realized in respect to its pure potentiality as related to
determinate logical subjects is termed a 'propositional feeling' in the
mentality of the actual occasion in question.’ – Alfred North Whitehead in Process and Reality
How
do we go about architecture when Everybody talks about Chance?
AI,
probability, and stochastics actively shape our Zeitgeist and add new
vocabulary to our architectural atlas. A few years ago, the publication Everybody
talks about the Weather (2023) addressed another public issue, the
climate crisis, with a call to study the climate through art and science. The
seminar wants to emulate this coping mechanism to make architecture as a
process that is simultaneously natural and artificial, as chance and the
weather.
In
the Chance seminar, we will explore the weather as
a metaphor – through clouds, storms, air, lightings, pollution, flooding, kairos,
the weatherman – to talk about chance as mutation, ambiguity, contradiction and
pattern.
A
pattern, however, is not a habit. Habits are elements of organization,
prediction, framing and comfort in daily life. For the artist Shusaku Arakawa
and the poet Madeline Gins, an artist collaboration which began in 70s New
York, habits are highly suspicious. In their work - Bioscleave House (2008),Container of Perceiving (1984), Site of Reversible Destiny (1995),The mechanism of meaning (1968-1988) - they favor an art of space-making
that is shaped by mutable habits.
The
work of Arakawa+Gins will guide our first explorations and incentivize our
focus around points of inflection and changes in direction. We will talk about
eternity and destiny when designing within probabilistic setups as a gesture
that overcomes the platitude of total randomness, or the comfort of habit.
From
the ‘moving pictures of thought’ that Charles Peirce sees in diagrams, or the
‘strange loops’ of Douglas Hofstadter we will see how the
enactment of habits turns into patterns of creation. We will continue with
books that look at chance, the weather, ambiguity, contradiction, and
metamorphose them into manners, process, magic and ideas to arrive at
Architecture.
https://www.uibk.ac.at/de/architekturtheorie-baugeschichte/architekturtheorie/events/the-architecture-chat/The Architecture Chat is the new lecture series of the Institute of Architectural Theory introduced in the summer semester 2024, dedicated to providing space for discussions about the relation of architecture with philosophy and science. It was conceived, designed and organized by Maya Christodoulaki and moderated by Maya Christodoulaki, Tim Altenhof and Miro Roman.
Communication in architecture is nothing new: a forum, a dialogue, a platform – there are countless formats which allow us to talk to each other. Yet, the Chat has charmed the world as an art of discovery, as for over a year now it transcends its sonorous articulations by reading, thinking and writing computationally through LLMs with us and for us. At this turning point, the Architecture Chat aims to facilitate new concepts and approaches to thinking about architecture, seeking creative ways to bridge intellectual traditions with new narratives in the face of prescient political and natural realities.
This spring we welcome six guests: Stephan Trüby (Uni Stuttgart), Philippe Morel (The Bartlett), Vera Bühlmann (TU Wien), Tülay Atak (Die Angewandte), Jörg Gleiter (TU Berlin) and Andrew Witt (Harvard GSD) in our faculty to listen to and discuss their recent publications. With the Architecture Chat we hope to touch upon current issues in our discipline, exploring boundaries and formats, discussing rhetoric and formulations, and probing what fascinates us and what might go out of fashion.
There is chatting and rumbling, murmur, and noise - Machine Learning is about dealing with signals that are muddy and unclear in which we look for harmony and sense.
In this seminar at TU Wien, we will explore ways to work conceptually as a space-maker with the idea of CHANCE. With Large Language Models, an architect’s operation has shifted from designing to architecting, as an act of navigation with and among the myriad nodes and connections that make up the art of space-making.
We set the center of this architecting operation in the kitchen, where CHANCE manifests through a creator/inventor/thinker that improvises with Midjourney, ChatGBT and AskAlice all possible text-to-text, text-to-image and image-to-text productions. In the kitchen we find our tools: we learn to improvise using Machine Learning Models (convolution, GAN, stable diffusion) and use them as storytelling devices. On the kitchen table, we play a game of associations from speech-to-image (DIXIT) to experiment with the backbone of every narration, biographies. Here, we open a communication channel with non-other than (our own) Leon Battista Alberti. He is perhaps best known for his seminal work Ten Books on Architecture (1452), or his treatises On Painting (1435), and On Sculpture (1464). Yet in this seminar, we focus on Alberti’s antiquarianism, art of discovery and autobiographical motif found in his letters, short stories and mythical novels.
With these tools at hand, this seminar examines an architectural hypothesis, suggesting that the probabilistic, self-referential nature of Machine Learning aligns with concepts inherent in architecture and the art of space-making.
TranstextualInvention2022-2026 Research, Filarete, ATTP, TU Vienna,Architecture Theory
The dissertation presents a study of the Early Renaissance sculptor and architect Antonio di Piero Averlino (1400 – c. 1469), known as ‘Filarete’, by examining matters of rhetoric, probability, law and fallibility. The primary goal is a methodological enquiry of architectural writing in the light of advances in non-linear processing. These subjects provide the necessary relational structures to examine the stochastic conception behind the architect’s single literary work, the Libro Architettonico, and connect to matters of probabilistic rhetoricity in data-driven architectural production. The thesis proposes a reevaluation of the theoretical frame of his opus that focuses on formal concerns, and the substantiation of intellectual and mathematical trajectories, like non-linear argumentation, that are fitting to the dialogical narrative and metaphorical drawings of the Libro. The thesis connects the unfavored treatment of Filarete to an emphasis on stylistic concerns that prioritize architectural attribution pertaining to key references like Leon Battista Alberti and instead suggests a wider observational canon of dialogical literature. Recent studies on premodern rhetorics will play a vital role in informing Filarete’s exposure to humanist, neoplatonic and scholastic literature. The principal objective of this project is to examine how Filarete’s persona centered around the idea of virtue relates to transtextual invention and the humanist use of ‘the probable’, as well as how quasi-propositions influence his unique architectonic conception in a manner sufficient to challenge any notion of inferiority as-a-thinker, as well as an-author.
Throwing dice for non-gamblers2024
Research, Conference, ATTP 40th Anniversary Symposium on Cooperation and Exchange between Southeast University and ETH Zurich in Nanjing, China. Reimagining Architecture: Navigating the Impact of Computing and Artificial Intelligence
Starting with a tapestry from 1959 called Les dés sont jetés (The
Dice are Cast) by Le Corbusier (1887-1965), this paper aims to open up the
Greek word διακυβεύω, meaning ‘to play at dice with’, or ‘mit Einem
würfeln’. Jørn Utzon commissioned the Swiss Architect to create a piece that
would hang in the Sydney Opera House. The decorative work with its declarative
title leaves no room to connect with the aleatory and statistical prehistories
of probabilistic thinking. And yet, since the dice are thrown, they allude to
the modernist prerogative of not dealing with uncertainty and ignoring the
universe of a yet-to-be-thrown dice. Given the etymological connection of the hazardous with the dice, the paper aims to explore the chances that a non-gambler
like Le Corbusier would engage with the probabilistic without the popular apocalyptic
para-philology. As a physical object, the dice was shaped by the uniform
materials like ivory (Hacking, 1999) that would ensure a certain objective
equidistance from the cases to be. As a digital object, that technical material
property that safeguards the game is missing, producing a gap, in our
relationship with uncertainty. What is the διακύβευμα, the
result of throwing the dice, then? Is there anything puritanical in the way we
see chance today? What tapestry are we weaving and how do we think within the
naughty, self-referential environment of Large Language Models?
Le Corbusier, 1959, Les dés sont jetés,
www.jstor.org/stable/community.9485523
www.academia.edu/104812561/The_Canvassed_Opinions_of_FrankensteinThis essay was written for Dixit Algorizmi, a publication on the history of technology and its relationship with contemporary artistic production curated by Sheida Ghomashchi and Space Caviar for the 2022 Pavilion of the Republic of Uzbekistan at the Venice Biennale.